In United States law, diversity jurisdiction is a concept used in civil procedure to refer to the situation in which a U.S. (federal) district court has subject matter jurisdiction to hear a civil case because the parties are "diverse" in citizenship, which generally indicates that they are citizens of different states (corporate parties, and non-U.S. citizens can also be included). Diversity jurisdiction and federal question jurisdiction (i.e., jurisdiction over issues arising under federal law) constitute the two primary sources of subject matter jurisdiction in U.S. federal courts.

The United States Constitution, in Article III, § 2, gives the U.S. Congress the power to permit federal courts to hear diversity cases through legislation authorizing such jurisdiction. The provision was included because the framers of the Constitution were concerned that when a case is filed in one state, and it involves parties from that state and another state, the state court might be biased toward the party from that state. Congress first exercised that power and granted federal trial circuit courts diversity jurisdiction in the Judiciary Act of 1789. Diversity jurisdiction is presently codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1332.

From Wikipedia under the GNU Free Documentation License
Mon Jul 6 12:22:09 2009

Liberi v Taitz: Motion for Leave to Dismiss Sundquist and Rock ...
nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com
Liberi v Taitz: Motion for Leave to Dismiss Sundquist and Rock ...

Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause

hu, 18 Jun 2009 17:21:38 GM

Plaintiffs filed their Complaint based on . Diversity Jurisdiction. and Defendant s James Sundquist and Rock Salt Publishing, owned and operated by James Sundquist, are dispensable nondiverse parties to the within action who are ...

N:\Docs\E-DOS\2009-03-30\08-1137 Triple H (final op) 3-25-09.wpd
caselaw.lp.findlaw.com
N:\Docs\E-DOS\2009-03-30\08-1137 Triple H (final op) 3-25-09.wpd

unknown

ue, 31 Mar 2009 03:00:06 GM

Here, . diversity jurisdiction. is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1332 because it is undisputed that Triple H and Companion are two completely diverse parties disputing a claim exceeding $75000. See Advance Am. Servicing of Ark., Inc. v. ...

Federal Court Has Discretion to Exercise Supplemental Jurisdiction ...
wvbusinesslitigationblog.com
Federal Court Has Discretion to Exercise Supplemental Jurisdiction ...

unknown

ue, 16 Jun 2009 02:59:08 GM

Ratchford sued at least two West Virginia residents, which destroyed . diversity. , but CSX Hotels, Inc.' s bankruptcy in March created federal . jurisdiction. under 28 U.S.C. 1334. In April, CSX filed this notice of removal. ...

From Google Blog Search: "Diversity jurisdiction"
Sun Jul 12 23:03:24 2009